Our website uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience.
Your message has been sent. We will email you at
If you haven't received our response, please do the following:
check your Spam/Junk folder and click the
"Not Spam" button for our message.
This way, you won't miss messages from our team in the future.
A PVS-Studio team and our product make a great contribution to upgrading of software quality. Moreover, in addition to detecting errors in closed and open source projects, there is an indirect contribution to the development of compilers and other tools of code analysis. We are pleased that in some cases we are trendsetters and we decided to dedicate a small note to this in our blog.
PVS-Studio is a static code analyzer for detecting errors and potential vulnerabilities in source code of programs, written in C, C ++, C# and Java.
To popularize the methodology of static code analysis and our tool, we write articles on checks of various open projects. In addition, we check various compilers once in a while. For example, we've tested and found bugs in projects such as: GCC, LLVM, PascalABC.NET, Roslyn.
More than once we've come across an interesting fact. As soon as we check, let's say, LLVM or GCC, a couple of new diagnostics appear in these compilers in the next or in the next but one release. And they detect errors that PVS-Studio managed to find in their code :). Unfortunately, we haven't noted the dates and links to corresponding improvements, so you'll have to take our word for it. Various C++ compilers borrow some of our diagnostics and we think it's perfectly normal, right and useful!
In addition to C++ compilers, C# analyzers have also started adopting ideas of our diagnostics. Which means, the C# analyzer, implemented in PVS-Studio, has become another lodestar! It's nice and cool to be aware of it.
In this case, I can track how it happened, let's say, in real time. On August 13, 2019 we posted a large article on the check of .NET Core Libraries (CoreFX). Among other things, this article describes an error pattern related to usage of interpolated strings (see the V3138 diagnostic). CoreFX developers took an interest in our publication and began to correct the errors we found. And on August 14, they got to the errors we found related to these very interpolated strings: Fix a few missing $s for string interpolation in tracing.
Here starts the most interesting part. In that very day, a new task appeared in the Roslyn Analyzers project on implementing a new diagnostic "New rule: Interpolated strings that are missing the $ special character #2767", related right to errors, fixed in CoreFX. We're so glad that our efforts turned out to be useful for CoreFX developers and our diagnostics have become a role model for Roslyn Analyzers developers. It is a bit unfortunate that the PVS-Studio tool isn't mentioned anywhere in the discussion. It seems as if they found those errors and came up with the idea to make diagnostics themselves. Of course, we would be flattered, if we were mentioned as the original source. Well, that's fine.
Why did we decide to write about all this? We are very pleased and we are even a bit proud of ourselves! By studying our experience, other compilers implement new diagnostics, it improves the quality of developed software as a whole. I understand that we aren't the only one who influence the development of compiler's error-finding capabilities. However, we are pleased to know that we are contributing to this process.
Are we concerned that other tools are gradually learning to find the same bugs as PVS-Studio? No. Our tool exists and is sold right for the reason that we are always ahead of compilers' capabilities. Our purpose is to always stay ahead. The awareness that someone is constantly making up for us doesn't leave us the right to relax, and it benefits everyone. In addition, it should be understood that PVS-Studio is not only warnings, but also:
Thank you for your attention. Hopefully, you share our joy for PVS-Studio. Try our analyzer for continuous code quality control of your projects.
Additional links:
0
0
0
0